<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faceless Watch</title>
	<link>http://figuresmag.com/archive/faceless-watch/</link>
	<description>The Social in the Visual</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: drnic</title>
		<link>http://figuresmag.com/archive/faceless-watch/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator>drnic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://figuresmag.com/archive/faceless-watch/#comment-2099</guid>
		<description>Ethically yes, but the difficulty of course is enormous given the exponential growth of the Net. Is ethics something that should be examined, and if so, how?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethically yes, but the difficulty of course is enormous given the exponential growth of the Net. Is ethics something that should be examined, and if so, how?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uriah</title>
		<link>http://figuresmag.com/archive/faceless-watch/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>uriah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://figuresmag.com/archive/faceless-watch/#comment-797</guid>
		<description>"...pull so much creative work free of its cultural and personal, authorial anchors?" Maybe it's this I most enjoy, it's so loose. In particular with ffffound, the visual information is the authority. The site deals with the visual information, sometimes poorly, but tries to match similar colours, similar type, similar sizes, photographs with other photographs(a qualitative approach). The finders are celebrated, they have their own stream not the designers, or authors.

Without these finders would have found this watch? Or would it have been lost into the void in the Web. Ethically, should finders be more personal responsible to credit original ownership?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;pull so much creative work free of its cultural and personal, authorial anchors?&#8221; Maybe it&#8217;s this I most enjoy, it&#8217;s so loose. In particular with ffffound, the visual information is the authority. The site deals with the visual information, sometimes poorly, but tries to match similar colours, similar type, similar sizes, photographs with other photographs(a qualitative approach). The finders are celebrated, they have their own stream not the designers, or authors.</p>
<p>Without these finders would have found this watch? Or would it have been lost into the void in the Web. Ethically, should finders be more personal responsible to credit original ownership?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola</title>
		<link>http://figuresmag.com/archive/faceless-watch/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://figuresmag.com/archive/faceless-watch/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>This is where context becomes really important, also content, and yes, authenticity!! The difficulty is of course, how can this be established? Does this go into the murky water of censorship and ethics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is where context becomes really important, also content, and yes, authenticity!! The difficulty is of course, how can this be established? Does this go into the murky water of censorship and ethics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
